I found this book rather tiresome and way too "clever" for my taste. The author seems to be showing off rather than trying to write an enjoyable mystery. I did not like any of the characters, so I did not care what happened to them. The book is too long and involved; it is not worth the time I spent reading it.
The concept is interesting; there is a mystery within a mystery, as a manuscript of a murder mystery has been delivered to a publisher, and then the author dies suddenly in what could be an accident but might be foul play. The book contains both the manuscript and the surrounding story, and the two are interrelated. That sounds like it would be really good, and I was looking forward to reading it. Somehow it misses the mark; I finished the book, but it was unsatisfying.
There are a zillion references to Agatha Christie mysteries and some other mysteries. I am sure there are readers who would love this book, but I am not one of them.
A love letter to mid century mysteries and novelists. If you enjoy Agatha Christie and contemporaries, you'll really enjoy Magpie Murders. Not the most compelling or fast-paced read; but decent writing from a clever author.
The interesting device of this book is the mystery novel within a mystery novel. At times I forgot which mystery I was reading. But I found it engaging and fun though it did seem like it borrowed quite a bit from Agatha Christie's Hercule Poirot. The only thing I didn't like was the clumsy deus ex machina at the very end. That I thought was a huge disappointment considering the excellent writing that preceded it.
If you love solving murder mysteries, wouldn’t it be great if your biggest clue was another murder mystery? Metafiction for lovers of traditional mysteries with relatable characters and just enough twists to keep things interesting.
I enjoyed most of the novel, but the disclaimer at the beginning was unwarranted. When I re-read it after finishing the book, the character did say that it was life-changing for her (which it was), but there was no reason to warn other readers. It certainly didn't stand out as one of the best books I've ever read, and most definitely was not life changing.
I read this over two days and even then had a difficult time keeping track of all the characters/suspects in two different mysteries; it’s easy to forget why the various characters would be considered suspects and I thought about making notes to refer back to. But instead I made the effort to read through it as quickly as possible. Overall, well-written with two interesting plots.
A fun throwback to golden-age English mysteries . Book editor Susan sits down to read the manuscript for the latest novel featuring fictional detective Atticus Pund. We read along with her, but as the story speeds along to a climax, Susan discovers that the final pages of the manuscript are missing, Susan's publisher boss has received a suicide letter from author Alan Conway, and he has been found dead. As Susan tries to find the missing manuscript, she begins to suspect Conway may not have ended his own life.
The literary mystery reminds me of A.S Byatt's novel Possession (one of my all-time favorites) as different documents offer clues to Conway's life and possible motives for his death. The plot is highlighted by comedic glimpses into the world of contemporary publishing, including the real life grandson of Agatha Christie as a character, the premise of an author trapped by his own success, and ruminations on whether murder mysteries are literature or junk.
But I found Susan to be a disappointing protagonist. It seemed unbelievable for a book editor to be more interested in her amateur murder investigation than in tracking down the missing manuscript. And the choice she made to resolve her personal life was a letdown.
When we finally do read the once missing pages, the ending to the Atticus Pund mystery is quite clever. I was able to guess both "whodunnits" , but was surprised by additional plot twists related to motive. Though the motive for Alan Conway's murder is a bit silly, it leads to a highly suspenseful climax.
A cautionary note for E-Readers: make sure to begin reading at the "Magpie Murders" title page or at the table of contents. My digital copy loaded and opened at the title page for Alan Conway's manuscript, bypassing the "Crouch End, London" chapter.
I feel as if this novel should come with a disclaimer. It would go something like this: "Warning, the book you are about to read requires a surplus of long-suffering from its reader." The interruptions are jarring, but the novel is so brilliant I could not rate it anything under 4.5 stars. You have been warned ;)
This thriller is great if you loved Gone Girl or Girl on the Train. It's about Susan Ryeland who's an editor for a bestselling mystery novel writer. But she soon believes that this may be about real life. What I like about this book is that the main character is an everyman, she's relatable to most of her readers because she doesn't really know what she's doing.
- @Florence of the Teen Review Board of the Hamilton Public Library
I liked the enveloping story better than the Atticus Pund novel in the center. I never did care much for Agatha Christie and Pund was another in the Hercule Periot mold.
There are no ages for this title yet.
There are no summaries for this title yet.
There are no notices for this title yet.
There are no quotes for this title yet.